Chapter Three
The lore of small alchemical stones being
chipped at and shared with others abounded – and still do abound. Stories of
exactly how much gold a small crumb of the stone could produce are in no
shortage throughout the arcana.
Over and over again the journals catalogue the use of the “Philosopher’s Stone” to turn little hunks, chunks, and crumbs of base metals into gold. And the sizes of the “Philosopher’s Stone” used in these journals varies from one mad-man to the next; one alchemist to the next, one scientist to the next. And yet, no scientist or magi has produced a culpable scrape of any such mineral.
Over and over again the journals catalogue the use of the “Philosopher’s Stone” to turn little hunks, chunks, and crumbs of base metals into gold. And the sizes of the “Philosopher’s Stone” used in these journals varies from one mad-man to the next; one alchemist to the next, one scientist to the next. And yet, no scientist or magi has produced a culpable scrape of any such mineral.
What John Aaron Tierney would discover was
that he had had the philosopher's stone in his possession all along. What he
would also learn was that no man could really wholly possess the stone. Itself
it was a conundrum.
And yet, what became a constant problem in
and throughout the literature is that it was specific and vague at one and the
same time. You could read it to mean one thing and of course it may not mean
that thing at all. Or, you could read it to mean another and it did not mean
that thing either. This is why people began to call the alchemists mad. There
was no simple one line of thought or reasoning. Their meaning shifted this way
and that; they were all over the map of human exploration and design. And,
this of course is what kept Tierney wandering close on the heels of the meaning
of the alchemists, but just out of reach. Until that one day.
The stone was not so much a mineral as a
metaphor. Coded into the history books of the East and West was this image of a
life altering, position changing rock that could open vistas for the possessor.
It was not unlike the power and myth of the Grail.
The search for the grail was the search
for the vessel that bore the Body and Blood of Christ. Of late, it
has emerged that the quest for the grail was really the quest for the human
soul or perhaps the Magdalene and the hidden secrets of her love for the Master. And
so, what had been thought to be an actual grail became the image and likeness
of what the grail is by meaning.
The grail was a metaphoric transference object. The search for enlightenment and wholeness was coded and hidden in tales of knights looking for a chalice. The grail held all the images and all the teachings of a cult that revered and sought the ability to house the Master of the Universe in a vessel. All of the images, all of the teachings and all of the lore pointed to the grail as a symbol for the soul. The soul as the place that would house the Master of the Universe.
What John Aaron Tierney found was that the
stone was really the core of the soul — the will, the desire. Human freedom,
desire, choice and the will were the things that were at the core of the soul
and at the core of being able to change one thing into another.
Somehow we had the will within our
possession, but it eluded our grasp 100% of the time. Will must somehow be
converted into submission so power could be bought — transmutation acquired.
I think it was this riddle that caused him
to come undone. I think it was this continual working with pairs of opposites
that pushed him over the edge, or what appeared to be over the edge in the eyes
of his colleagues.
It pushed him over the edge and into the
unity that was at the base of sanctity and insanity. It pushed him over into
the world of a phrase that swam about inside of him until it came out and
became him.
Perhaps the Gnostics were right,
"that which we bring forth from within will save us, and that which we do
not bring forth will damn us."
When he realized that the will produces
the object of its desire, then he realized that sanctity and insanity lie close
at bay. Everything that occurred in the thirty-five years was helping his will
to discover what it already knew: "The line between opposites is
invisible."
Opposites and pairs of opposites marked
every aspect of his research. His thoughts could go white with confusion in the
midst of his prodding and smelting and studying. He could only sustain the flux
of such research for so long. What emerged from this flux was a state of
consciousness that people identified with insanity. He looked cracked to the
rest of the world. He was merely becoming whole.
He was not crazy, his attempts to conjoin
opposites within himself made him drop out of sanity and into insanity in the
eyes of the world at large. Given that the world at large does not possess
genuine discrimination, they were (and still are) unable to assess Tierney's
stability. And so their view was not accurate. Or, at least for this story.
In fact, he was
becoming sanctified. People just did not know this.
He was crazy — at least to most. This is
how he appeared when he shared his discovery after many years of searching. He
was crazy for those that did not know, and sanctified for them that did know. I
wish I could be less ambiguous about it, but there you have it.
The man himself became the very riddle he tried to solve. Tierney
was an enigma and a conundrum to all who looked on. Some, those who could not
sustain enigmas, were unable to accept that he was whole. Those who could
balance the unanswered koans of meaning, found him a joy.
Having been a friend of Tierney’s for years, I have had the
advantage of having watched him fade in and out of a clarity concerning these ideas
about the “Philosopher’s Stone” and one thing becoming another. It
is from that vantage point that I shall try to describe for you here how he
came unglued only to find himself living the very mystery he searched for all
these years.
by, N. Thomas Johnson-Medland ©
2015 All Rights Reserved
Comments
Post a Comment